Class Notes, Chapter 13, second part
One-Factor Experiments: General
Reading: 13.5-13.10
Design I: CRSF
13.5 Single degree of freedon comparisons
- Comparisons are hypotheses - a linear combination of population
means
- General formula for hypotheses is:
- For the main effect of treatment:
- For a single degree of freedom comparison, examples and general formula:
The comparison hypothesis is tested like the main effect hypothesis
- Find the Sum of Squares omega:
- MSomega = SSomega / dfomega
- Fomega = MSomega / MSE
- so:
Anova Table, 13.7
| Source |
SS |
df |
MS |
F |
| Treatment, A |
85356 |
4 |
21339 |
4.30 |
| Comparison, omega |
14553 |
1 |
14553 |
2.93 |
| Error, E |
124021 |
25 |
4961 |
|
| Total, T |
209377 |
29 |
|
|
Orthogonal comparisons: the contrasts are "independent"
orthogonal set
- k - 1 comparisons
- all mutually orthogonal
13.6 Multiple comparisons
- Note: relationship between F and t:
Experiment-wise error rate
- If H0 true, there is still a possibility of rejecting
it: Type-I, or alpha, error
- If many tests are done in an experiment, the probability of at
least one false rejection goes up:
Methods for reducing experiment-wise error rates
I. Bonferroni Test
- for j comparisons, adjust alpha using alpha/j as the new alpha-level;
for example, .05/20 = .0025; experiment-wise alpha then = .049
- conservative test
II. Tukey's test - adjust for doing all possible paired
comparisons, compare each difference of sample means to:
- the critical q value is in Table A.12 for alpha = .05
III. Dunnett's Test - compare all treatments to a control group,
compare each difference between a test group mean and the control group
mean to:
Data transformation
ANOVA is robust to non-normality
- But sometimes the non-normality leads to unequal variances
- Some distributions are known to become better in this regard if
the data are transformed
examples:
- lognormal distribution: take the natural log
- Poisson: take the square root of the data
- exponential or gamma: take the natural log
DESIGNS
Design classifications
- Basic element:
(1) CR-SF
- (note: could also be:
Generalized Randomized Block design)
Completely Randomized Single Factor Design:
- Means coding
- Effects coding
- Fixed Effects (Model I)
- k groups, or treatments
- ni measurements (observations, data points) in each group
- if all ni equal, just use n
the "traditional" hypothesis of the main effect of treatment is
- that is, all group means are equal
- Residuals are calculated:
Other designs, with the purpose of increasing statistical
precision
- blocking - the focus today
(2) RCB-SF
Randomized Complete Block Single Factor
- Fixed Effects (Model I)
- a treatments
- b blocks
- n = 1 observation per cell
- blocks help remove extraneous error
- assume normal distribution, random sampling, random asignment, homogeneity
of variance, plus ...
- have to assume, and there must not be, any treatment x block
interaction
- model:
epsilonij
- (note no interaction terms in the model)
- two factors: one treatment, that we do test, and one blocking, that
we don't
- H0: alphai = 0
- Residuals are calculated:
- computational formulas:
-
Anova Table
| Source |
SS |
df |
MS |
F |
| Treatment, A |
SSA |
dfA |
MSA |
F = MSA/MSE |
| Blocks, B |
SSB |
dfB |
|
|
| Error, E |
SSE |
dfE |
MSE |
|
| Total, T |
SST |
dfT |
|
|
(3) RB-IF
Randomized Block Incomplete Factorial; specifically, Latin Square design
- Fixed Effects (Model I)
- a treatments
- b blocks1
- c blocks2
- n = 1 observation per cell
- blocks help remove extraneous error
- assume normal distribution, random sampling, random asignment, homogeneity
of variance, plus ...
- have to assume, and there must not be, any treatment x block
interactions, block x block interactions or treatment x block x block interaction
- model:
- (note no interaction terms in the model)
- three factors: one treatment, that we do test, and two blocking, that
we don't
- H0: alphai = 0
- Residuals are calculated:
- computational formulas for the Latin Square design with n = 1, two
blocking and one treatment factor, r = the number of levels of the
factors:
-
Anova Table
| Source |
SS |
df |
MS |
F |
| Treatment, A |
SSA |
dfA |
MSA |
F = MSA/MSE |
| Blocks, B |
SSB |
dfB |
|
|
| Blocks, C |
SSC |
dfC |
|
|
| Error, E |
SSE |
dfE |
MSE |
|
| Total, T |
SST |
dfT |
|
|
An example of a situation where a Latin Square design would be useful is:
- "Suppose we are interested in the yields of 4 varieties of wheat using 4
different fertilizers over a period of 4 years." [Note: 1 treatment (wheat type),
2 blocking (fertilizers, years)] If the types of wheat are A, B, C and D, then a common
way of showing the data would be:
Yields of Wheat in kg/plot
| Fertilizer |
1981 |
1982 |
1983 |
1984 |
| f1 |
A: 70 |
B: 75 |
C: 68 |
D: 81 |
| f2 |
D: 66 |
A: 59 |
B: 55 |
C: 63 |
| f3 |
C: 59 |
D: 66 |
A: 39 |
B: 42 |
| f4 |
B: 41 |
C: 57 |
D: 39 |
A: 55 |
Designs 4, 5 and 6 are included for those who are interested:
(4) Random Effects - SF
Random Effects Model - Single Factor
- Random Effects (Model II)
- a treatments - treatment levels are a random variable
- assume normal distribution, independent observations, homogeneity
of variance
- model: Yij = mu + Ai + Eij
- (text uses capitals to emphasize the random variables)
- one factor: one treatment
- H0: Ai = 0
- computational formulas:
- just like CR-SF
(5) Random Effects - RB-Random Blocks
Randomized Blocks - Random Block
- Random Effects (Model II)
- a treatments - treatment levels are a random variable
- b blocks - block levels are a random variable
- assume normal distribution, independent observations, homogeneity
of variance
- model: Yij = mu + Ai + Bj + Eij
- (text uses capitals to emphasize the random variables)
- two factors: one treatment, one blocking
- H0: Ai = 0
- computational formulas:
- just like RCB-SF
(6) Random Effects - RB-IF
Random Incomplete Blocking - Random Blocks; specifically, Latin Square
design
- Random Effects (Model II)
- a treatments - treatment levels are a random variable
- b blocks - block levels are a random variable
- c blocks - block levels are a random variable
- assume normal distribution, independent observations, homogeneity
of variance
- model: Yijk = mu + Ai + Bj +
Ck + Eijk
- (text uses capitals to emphasize the random variables)
- three factors: one treatment, two blocking
- all three must have the same number of levels
- H0: Ai = 0
- computational formulas:
- just like RIB-SF Latin Square
Class Home